RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged as a life-threatening respiratory condition, especially in immunocompromised patients, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Initially detected in China in December 2019, the first case in India was diagnosed on January 30, 2020. Here we report a nosocomial COVID-19 outbreak among cancer patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) in a medical oncology unit of a tertiary care hospital from our region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive study of the nosocomial COVID-19 outbreak and was conducted in the month of January 2022 at the medical oncology unit of a tertiary care hospital in Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), India. The study included 25 COVID-19 cases, including patients and HC/non-HCWs (NHCWs). The confirmation of diagnosis was done through real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs as the test sample. RESULTS: Twenty-five COVID-19 cases, including 14 admitted patients, nine HCWs, and two NHCWs were confirmed by COVID-19 RT-PCR in a span of 11 days. The first case was a positive HCW. The patients were admitted for management of various hematological as well as solid organ malignancies. Of the 14 patients, eight were in the pediatric age group with a mean age of 6.9 years, and six were adults with a mean age of 55.2 years. Thirteen patients were on different chemotherapy protocols, and one was undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant. Of the 14 patients, four were asymptomatic for COVID-19 symptoms, eight had mild disease, and two had severe disease with respiratory failure. Two patients with severe diseases needed COVID-19-designated high-dependency unit (HDU) admission. There was one COVID-19-related death. Among the healthcare workers, the mean age was 33.8 years, of which six were males and three were females. All the HCWs and NHCWs had mild disease, and all of them recovered completely. CONCLUSION: Nosocomial COVID-19 illness is a new entity and is preventable. COVID-19 illness will remain in society after the pandemic is over, like the influenza B viral illness, and there can be seasonal flares in the future. Proper measures should be taken to prevent its clustering in hospital settings.
RESUMO
Objectives: The aim of our study is to see the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy (RT) for bleeding control in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Materials and Methods: It is a retrospective review based on observations of 74 AGC patients with a median age of 60 years (range 50-82 years) who had active tumour bleeding and were treated with palliative RT. Treatment response was assessed by both subjective symptom relief and objective change in parameters. Objective response to RT was defined by an increase in the median haemoglobin (Hb) level of patients and a decrease in number of packed red blood cell (RBC) units needed by patients after RT. Results: Response to haemostatic RT was observed in 52 patients out of 74 patients (70.27%). We observed a significant increase in mean Hb level after palliative RT. Pre-RT mean Hb was 6.14 ± 1.01 and post-RT mean Hb was 7.19 ± 1.75 (P < 0.05). Response to RT was also evident in a significant decrease in the number of packed RBC units post-haemostatic RT. The mean number of pre-RT transfused packed RBC units was 8.28 ± 3.76 and post-RT, it was 4.34 ± 2.91 (P < 0.05). The median overall survival was 90 days and the median transfusion-free survival was 40 days. Conclusion: RT may be an effective treatment option for bleeding control in AGC. In our study, we observed fair and reasonably durable haemostasis. A success rate of 70.24% was documented with clinical palliation, a higher Hb level and fewer transfusions after RT. This modality for bleeding control is more important and reliable in situations where alternative modalities are not feasible.
RESUMO
Background: The management of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) at present is based primarily on radiotherapy, but the technique by which radiation therapy is delivered is different such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy (2D-CRT). Materials and Methods: In our study, IMRT and 2D-CRT were compared for their treatment outcome in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. Patients with Stage II to IVA nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th and 8th edition 2017 treated with IMRT (n = 30) and 2D-CRT (n = 30) between October 2016 and October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We matched our patients by using the propensity-score matching method. OS was the primary endpoint of our study. The secondary endpoints were local relapse-free survival (LRFS), regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Acute and late radiation toxicities between IMRT and 2D-CRT were also compared. Results: In the propensity-matched cohort of 60 patients, 30 patients received 2D-CRT and 30 patients received IMRT. Compared with the treatment of 2D-CRT, the IMRT group is associated with a better 3-year OS (70% vs. 85% P = 0.045), LRFS (78% vs. 96% P = 0.047), RRFS (78% vs. 95% P = 0.015), DFS (80% vs. 95% P = 0.034), and PFS (84% vs. 90% P = 0.024), while as DMFS (85% vs. 85% P = 0.147) were comparable in both the groups. IMRT was also associated with a lower incidence of late toxicities such as xerostomia and trismus. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that IMRT yields better long-term overall survival and local control including LRFS, RRFS, DFS, and PFS. In addition, late toxicities induced by irradiation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are lower with IMRT. IMRT may be an effective treatment in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) as compared to 2D-CRT, but further studies are needed to establish the association.
